Core Refusal Reason
The development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out prior to the expiration of the original permission, failing to meet the statutory requirements for an extension of duration under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out on-site prior to the expiration of the original planning permission (Ref. 18/195).
- The applicant failed to provide mandatory information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 regarding environmental screening.
- Under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, an extension of duration cannot be granted where the authority is not satisfied that substantial works were carried out during the appropriate period.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for a previously granted permission (Ref. 18/195) for a four-bedroom, single-storey dwelling at Middle Road, Ardmore, Co. Waterford. The Planning Authority refused the request because the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out before the expiry of the original permission. Additionally, the applicant failed to provide mandatory information required by the Planning and Development Regulations, making the proposal...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.