23520

revisions to previously granted planning ref. 19/1090, which include : a: Refurbishment of existing stable block to include a new front facade, b: Alterations to existing dwelling for use as staff quarters, which include the demolition of existing side annex and store to the rear, and revision to existing layout and elevations. C: Refurbishment of existing water walker and horse walker and construction of a new roof covering over same, d: Construction of a new covered horse walker, e: Construction of a new stable block to the east of the site, f: Construction of a new dormer style dwelling and new detached garden room, g: decommissioning of existing septic tank serving existing dwelling onsite and the installation of 2 no. wastewater treatments systems. The application also includes for the following works which were previously granted under planning ref. 19/1090: h: Elevational alterations to existing horse pool building, and minor internal alterations including the removal of a staff living compartment within the building; i: Horse gallops, including alterations to localized ground levels, and including associated gallop lighting consisting of pole mounted lights, each pole 8 metre high at 20 metre centres; j: Alterations to existing site entrance including repositioning and construction of new entrance gates and associated localized boundary hedging; k: All associated site development works including roads, yards, paths, all-weather paddocks and exercise ring, paddock and gallop fencing, internal farm gates, undergrounding of main ESB lines with erection of associated poles, storm water percolation area, and general site and yard lighting

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

Failure to demonstrate a local rural housing need in accordance with Policy HO P11 and lack of justification for the scale of staff accommodation given the presence of an existing dwelling on-site.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The applicant has not satisfied the local rural housing need criteria as set out in Policy HO P11, particularly as an existing dwelling on-site is available for modification to meet their needs.
  • The provision of additional sizeable staff accommodation is considered premature and has not been sufficiently justified, as the equine enterprise is not yet operational.
  • There are outstanding technical and environmental concerns regarding the design and operation of wastewater treatment systems, drainage for equine facilities, and site access sightlines.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy HO P11Policy HO P12Policy HO O51Policy HO P26Objective HO O59Policy HO P27Policy HO P33Policy RD P3Policy RD P4Policy RD O16Section 15.9.8

Decision Document Summary

The proposal seeks amendments to a previously granted permission at Rathbridge, The Curragh, including a new dormer dwelling, staff quarters, and extensive equine facilities. While the principle of equine development is generally supported, the application was refused because the applicant failed to prove a 'local need' for a new house on a site that already contains a dwelling. Additionally, the scale of the proposed staff housing was deemed unjustified for a non-operational business, and the s...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.