Core Refusal Reason
The development's increased massing, height, and domestic-style architectural features (such as excessive windows and sliding doors) negatively impact the rural character of the area and deviate significantly from the previously approved agricultural/equine design.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The increased ridge height and overall massing of the structures result in an unacceptable visual impact on the countryside character compared to the previously granted permission.
- The inclusion of numerous windows and sliding doors in the 'tack room' lends the structure a domestic character that is inappropriate for an equine/agricultural building in a rural setting.
- The construction of a capped retaining wall on the southern boundary is considered an inappropriate suburban-style feature that is not supported in this rural environment.
Cited Policies (CDP)
RE P14RD O2RD O5RD O6RD P3RD P4RD O15RD O16Chapter 13Section 13.3.1Section 13.3.2Chapter 15Section 15.2.4Section 15.9.8
Decision Document Summary
Paul Ryan sought retention permission for an equine development at Mountarmstrong, Donadea, comprising a feed/machinery shed, stables, and ancillary works on a 2.17-hectare site. While the principle of equine development was established by a previous permission (19/1135), the planning authority found that the as-built structures significantly exceeded approved dimensions and heights. The application was refused due to the negative visual impact of the increased bulk and the introduction of domes...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.