2360092

the proposed works would consist of the following: - Importation and insertion of excavation spoil comprising natural materials of clay, silt, sand, gravel or stone for the purposes of restoration of a previously extracted area to restore the site to a beneficial agricultural and ecological afteruse; - It is estimated that c. 130,000m3 (200,000 tonnes) of inert material will be imported to the site. It is considered that the site would be active for 3 to 5 years. The shortest period of infill of 3 years has been used to assess impacts in this EIAR.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The development was refused due to serious traffic hazards arising from inadequate road infrastructure and information, and significant negative impacts on high-value biodiversity habitats and protected species.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposal would result in a serious traffic hazard due to inaccuracies in the road network data, lack of clarity regarding the entrance design, and unenforceable traffic management systems.
  • The development would cause significant and irreversible loss of high-value biodiversity habitats, including sand-martin nesting areas, calcareous grasslands, and breeding sites for protected species like newts and frogs.
  • The project fails to demonstrate sufficient legal interest in the lands required for proposed passing bays and does not align with County Development Plan objectives for the protection of ecosystems and sustainable development.

Cited Policies (CDP)

CPO 9.32CPO 9.35CPO 9.55CPO 12.49CPO 12.50CPO 12.51CPO 12.52CPO 12.53CPO 12.54CPO 15.3CPO 15.4CPO 15.5CPO 15.6CPO 17.1CPO 17.2CPO 17.3CPO 17.6CPO 17.24CPO 17.35CPO 17.36CPO 17.37CPO 17.38

Decision Document Summary

Coffey Construction Ltd proposed the importation of 200,000 tonnes of inert excavation spoil to restore a former 5.5ha sand and gravel quarry at Lugnagroagh, Co. Wicklow, to agricultural and ecological use. The site is located in a rural townland near the Poulaphouca Reservoir. Wicklow County Council refused the application because the proposed traffic management and road improvements were deemed inadequate, inaccurate, or legally unenforceable, posing a serious traffic hazard. Furthermore, the ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.