Core Refusal Reason
Failure to demonstrate that the development had commenced prior to the application for an extension of duration.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The Planning Authority is not satisfied that the development permitted under Ref. D17A/0974 has actually commenced.
- The application fails to comply with the mandatory criteria established by Section 42(1)(a)(i)(I) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended.
- Due to the lack of evidence regarding the commencement of works, the statutory requirements for extending the duration of the permission have not been met.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal involved a 5 sqm single-storey extension to an existing external store at 30 Sandycove Avenue West, Dún Laoghaire, which is a Protected Structure. The application for an extension of duration (Ref. D17A/0974/E) was refused by the Planning Authority. The refusal was based on the applicant's failure to prove that development had commenced, meaning the proposal did not meet the legal threshold required under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 for extending a planning p...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.