Core Refusal Reason
Failure to meet statutory requirements for an extension of duration regarding commencement and substantial completion of works.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The Planning Authority is not satisfied that the development permitted under Ref D17A/0921 has actually commenced.
- The application fails to meet the mandatory criteria set out in Section 42(1)(a)(i)(I) of the Planning and Development Act, as amended.
- There is no evidence that substantial works have been carried out pursuant to the permission as required by Section 42(1)(a)(i)(III) of the Act.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought an extension of duration for a previously permitted development consisting of a new two-storey, three-bedroom dwelling and vehicular access at 57 Meadow Vale, Blackrock. The Planning Authority refused the extension on the grounds that the development had not commenced within the appropriate period. Furthermore, the authority determined that the proposal failed to satisfy the legal requirements of the Planning and Development Act, as no substantial works had been completed to...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.