Core Refusal Reason
The development failed to meet the statutory requirements for an Extension of Duration as works had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out during the original permission period.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development to which the permission relates was not commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period sought to be extended.
- Substantial works were not carried out pursuant to the permission during the original period of the grant as required under Section 42(1)(a) of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
- The applicant failed to provide necessary information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 regarding environmental screening criteria.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an Extension of Duration for planning permission (Ref: 18/687) to construct a two-storey gable and single-storey rear extension at 26 TJ Murphy Place, Abbeyside, Dungarvan. Following a site inspection, the Planning Authority determined that the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been undertaken. As the proposal failed to satisfy the mandatory commencement and progress criteria set out in Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, the exte...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.