2360051

Retention permission to retain as constructed extension to existing cottage. Permission to form new site entrance and carry out all ancillary site development works at

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The extension is not subordinate to the original dwelling, effectively subsuming its character and form, which contravenes the County Development Plan's design standards for rural extensions.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The extension fails to remain subordinate to the original cottage, instead subsuming its form and character to the extent that the original structure is no longer discernible, violating rural design guidelines.
  • The applicant failed to demonstrate that the existing wastewater treatment system is adequate to serve the increased occupancy potential of the dwelling.
  • The presence of an unauthorized mobile home and discrepancies between the application site boundary and the established domestic curtilage raise concerns regarding orderly development.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 7.8Section 12.8Section 12.9Section 12.24Chapter 5 of the Roscommon Rural Design Guidelines

Decision Document Summary

Gabriel O Grady sought retention permission for an extension to an existing cottage and permission for a new entrance at Glenballythomas, Tulsk, Co. Roscommon. The Planning Authority expressed serious reservations as the extension is not subordinate to the original dwelling, effectively subsuming it and altering its character in a manner inconsistent with the County Development Plan and Rural Design Guidelines. Additionally, concerns were raised regarding the adequacy of the wastewater treatment...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.