Core Refusal Reason
The application failed to demonstrate that substantial works were carried out during the initial permission period, and the Planning Authority determined that an Appropriate Assessment is required for the remaining works, which precludes an extension of duration under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended).
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The Planning Authority is not satisfied that substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during the appropriate period as required by Section 42(1)(a)(ii) of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
- Under Section 42(8) of the Act, an extension cannot be granted if an Appropriate Assessment is required; in this case, the remaining works are likely to have a significant effect on the Poulaphuca Reservoir SPA and Wicklow Mountains SAC.
- The mitigation measures previously proposed, such as the Goose Farm Management Plan, are not considered standard and therefore cannot be used to screen out the requirement for a Natura Impact Statement at the screening stage.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
Solas Eireann Development Ltd sought an extension of duration for a previously permitted solar PV panel array on a 21.04ha site at Threecastles, Blessington, Co. Wicklow. The site is located in a sensitive rural area near the Poulaphuca Reservoir SPA. Wicklow County Council refused the extension because the works completed to date, consisting primarily of access tracks and fencing, were not deemed 'substantial' under the Planning and Development Act. Furthermore, the council concluded that the r...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.