Core Refusal Reason
The proposed extension would negatively impact the architectural and artistic character, integrity, and setting of Turlough Lodge, a Protected Structure, and is contrary to specific conservation objectives of the County Development Plan.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant failed to engage an RIAI Grade 2 Conservation Architect as advised, resulting in a proposal that lacks sufficient information to ensure the long-term interest and protection of the significant building.
- The proposed development would negatively impact the architectural and artistic significance of the Protected Structure, rendering it inconsistent and out of character with its surroundings and the landscape.
- The works are considered contrary to objectives BEO 9 and BEO 10 of the Mayo County Development Plan 2022-2028, which seek to protect the integrity, character, and setting of structures on the Record of Protected Structures.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Volume 1 Section 9.4.1.2BEO 9BEO 10Volume 4 List of Structures
Decision Document Summary
Michael and Marie Barrett sought permission to construct a rear extension and associated works at Turlough Lodge, Gortnafalla, Turlough, a site containing a two-storey dwelling listed as a Protected Structure (RPS 0231) with regional significance. Mayo County Council refused the application because the proposal was deemed to negatively impact the architectural integrity and character of the heritage building. The planning authority noted that the applicant failed to follow advice regarding the a...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.