Core Refusal Reason
The demolition of a traditional vernacular dwelling and its replacement with an architecturally unsuitable structure that negatively impacts the landscape and heritage, coupled with insufficient environmental assessment regarding nearby Special Areas of Conservation (SACs).
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed demolition of a traditional vernacular structure would result in the loss of architectural heritage and character, which is contrary to Rural Housing Objective RHO-9.
- The replacement structure is considered architecturally unsuitable in scale and design, creating a visually intrusive impact on the R319 main road and the amenity of adjoining properties.
- The application failed to provide sufficient information to rule out significant effects on the Keel Machair Menaun Cliffs SAC and Achill Head SAC, precluding a grant of permission under the Habitats Directive.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Tourism & Recreation Objective TRO 16Rural Housing Objective RHO-9
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought the demolition of an existing two-storey traditional dwelling at Bellanasally, Achill Island, to facilitate the construction of a new reception and coffee dock. The site is located in a sensitive coastal area near the R319. Mayo County Council refused the application primarily because the demolition of a vernacular building contradicts heritage preservation objectives (RHO-9) and the proposed replacement was deemed visually intrusive and poorly designed (TRO 16). Additionally...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.