Core Planning Reasoning
The Inspector recommended granting permission by amending the Planning Authority's restrictive Condition 3, concluding that the proposed large-scale, flat-roofed garage is acceptable in design and scale, as it integrates well with the existing built form and is screened by a mature hedge, thus not detracting from visual or residential amenities.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed garage, although large in footprint, is considered an acceptable addition to the streetscape that mirrors similar existing developments in the vicinity.
- The retention and protection of the mature front boundary hedge is critical to maintaining screening and preventing overbearing visual impacts.
- Condition 3 should be amended to remove the requirement for a significant setback and roof pitch change, while a standard Section 48 development contribution condition should be added.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Dublin City Development Plan 2022-2028Zoning Objective Z1 (Sustainable Residential Neighbourhoods)Appendix 18 (Ancillary Residential Accommodation)Section 1.2 (Extensions to Rear)Section 1.3 (Extension to Side)
Decision Document Summary
The application involves the construction of a 94 sqm ground-floor extension to the side of 55 Kilmore Close, Dublin 5, intended for use as a garage/store for three classic cars. Dublin City Council originally granted permission but imposed Condition 3, which required a 5m setback and a hipped roof to match the existing house, significantly reducing the garage's scale. The applicant appealed this condition, arguing the space was necessary for their hobby. The Inspector found that the site, locat...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP