23774

proposed two storey extension of 190.0sq.m to existing 50.0sq.m cottage, and privy. The development will consist of the following(1) Demolition of privy/coal shed at rear of existing dwelling replace with proposed garage.(2) Convert existing cottage to living area. With a 7.0sq.m rear extension and front porch. (3) Two storey extension to side and rear of existing cottage. Consisting of 4 no. bedrooms, 1 bathroom and 3 ensuites, work from home office. And Utility room.(4) Septic tank and percolation area. ( 5) mains water connection. (6) All associated site works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed extension is excessive in scale and massing, failing to respect the character of the original traditional cottage and appearing as a dominant, suburban-style new dwelling rather than a sympathetic, subservient extension.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The scale and massing of the proposed two-storey extension would dominate the original 50sq.m cottage, effectively creating a new dwelling behind the existing structure rather than a subservient extension.
  • The design incorporates suburban elements, such as an inappropriate roof-to-wall ratio, wide gables, and an ornate porch, which are contrary to the Wicklow Single Rural House Design Guide and fail to respect the traditional rural character of the site.
  • The proposal fails to comply with County Development Plan objectives CPO 6.4 and CPO 6.44, which require rural housing to be of high-quality, simple, and unobtrusive design that integrates well with the wider landscape.

Cited Policies (CDP)

CPO 6.3CPO 6.4CPO 6.5CPO 6.43CPO 6.44Appendix 1 (Section 3.1.8)Appendix 2 (Single Rural Houses Design Guidelines)

Decision Document Summary

Niall O Dowd sought permission for the demolition of outbuildings and the construction of a large two-storey extension to an existing 50sq.m cottage at No 2 Timmore, Newcastle, Co. Wicklow. The proposal would have increased the floor area to nearly 200sq.m, more than doubling the size of the original dwelling. Wicklow County Council refused the application primarily because the scale, massing, and suburban design of the extension were deemed unsympathetic to the original traditional cottage. The...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.