Core Refusal Reason
The proposed extension's design and materials, specifically the green corrugated metal cladding and bitumen roofing, are considered incompatible with the character of the existing dwelling and fail to comply with the design standards set out in the Clonmel and Environs Development Plan 2013.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The materials and finishes used for the extension do not match the existing building and are considered ill-considered and contrary to Policy 9.13 of the Development Plan.
- The development fails to demonstrate adequate proposals for the disposal of rainwater goods and surface water management at the rear of the dwelling.
- The extension occupies the full footprint of the previously existing rear yard, and the applicant failed to provide a revised site layout plan showing necessary maintenance and drainage arrangements.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy DM1Section 9.2Section 9.13Clonmel and Environs Development Plan 2013 (as varied)
Decision Document Summary
James Fitzpatrick sought retention permission for a 6.35 sqm rear extension (comprising a kitchen extension and bathroom) at 39 Upper Gladstone Street, Clonmel, a terraced dwelling in a 'Town Centre' zoned area. While the principle of development was deemed acceptable, the Planning Authority found the design and materials—specifically the green corrugated metal cladding—to be inconsistent with the existing building's character. Furthermore, the lack of surface water disposal plans for an extensi...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.