Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed dormer windows were refused due to their excessive size, massing, and lack of setback from the eaves, which would result in a visually obtrusive impact on the dwelling and the surrounding streetscape.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The size and massing of the proposed dormer structures are considered excessive and lack the necessary setback from the eaves.
- The dormers would have a dominant and visually obtrusive presence, negatively impacting the visual appearance of the existing house and the wider streetscape.
- The proposal fails to comply with the specific design standards for dormer extensions set out in Section 12.3.7.1 (iv) of the County Development Plan 2022-2028.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.3.7.1 (iv)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought permission for an attic conversion to habitable space, the removal of a chimney, and the conversion/extension of an existing garage at 2, Glencairn Garth, Leopardstown. While the garage conversion and internal modifications were granted, the planning authority issued a split decision, refusing permission for two dormer windows and a rooflight on the northern elevation. The refusal was based on the dormers' dominant scale and lack of setback from the eaves, which were deem...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.