2460011

development which will consist of/ consists of (a) permission for refurbishment of and extension to retained former house & garage for the social, recreational, environmental, enterprise & educational use by inhabitants of Castlepollard and visiting communities, with gardens, water features, greenhouses, roads, paths, car & bicycle parking, hard & soft landscaping, planting, lighting, site entrance boundaries & all associated ancillary utilities, facilities & site works. Retention permission for (b) Change of Use of retained lands and structures on site N91 NP40 from Use as a House to Class 9: Use as a social centre/ community centre

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal constitutes over-development on residential zoned land, lacking adequate parking and pedestrian connectivity, which would negatively impact residential amenity and create a traffic hazard.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The scale and intensity of the proposed community use on a relatively small site zoned 'Established Residential' would result in over-development and seriously injure the amenities of neighboring properties through noise and general disturbance.
  • The development is considered haphazard due to the lack of safe pedestrian connectivity to Castlepollard town centre and the absence of sufficient on-site parking to cater for the intensified use.
  • The additional traffic movements generated would interfere with the safety and free flow of traffic on the local road, creating a traffic hazard and setting an undesirable precedent for similar developments in residential areas.

Cited Policies (CDP)

CPO 4.2CPO 4.3CPO 4.17CPO 4.18CPO 9.17CPO 10.52CPO 15.1

Decision Document Summary

The applicant sought permission for the refurbishment and extension of a former dwelling and garage at Water Street, Castlepollard, to create a multi-purpose community and nature centre, including retention for change of use. The site is located in an 'Established Residential' zone. Westmeath County Council refused the application primarily because the intensity of the proposed use was deemed inappropriate for the residential context, leading to over-development and loss of amenity. Furthermore,...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.