Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out within the original permission period, failing to meet statutory requirements.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant stated on the application form that works had not commenced, which was subsequently confirmed by a site inspection on 27/03/2024.
- The development does not comply with Section 42(1)(a)(iii) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended), as substantial works were not carried out during the permitted period.
- The Planning Authority is legally precluded from granting an extension of duration when the mandatory statutory criteria regarding the commencement and progress of works are not satisfied.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought an extension of duration for planning permission Ref. 18/1309, which authorized the construction of a detached four-bedroom dwelling, a wastewater treatment system, and a new entrance at Larch Hill, Monasterevin, Co. Kildare. The subject site is located in a rural area approximately 2.5km southeast of Monasterevin, characterized by one-off housing and agricultural land. The application was refused because the planning authority determined that no construction works had commen...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.