Core Refusal Reason
The development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out prior to the expiration of the original planning permission, failing to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The planning authority is not satisfied that the development commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period sought to be extended.
- No substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during the original period of the grant.
- The application fails to meet the mandatory requirements set out in Section 42(1)(a) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) for an extension of duration.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref: 18/625) regarding a new service access entrance at the rear of Foleys Bar & Restaurant, a protected structure in Lismore, Co. Waterford. Following a site inspection, the planning authority determined that the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been undertaken before the expiry of the original permission. Consequently, the request was refused as it failed to comply with the statutory requirement...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.