249
the modifications to existing warehouse structure on site and development in accordance with approved plan Ref: ABP Ref: 303343-19, except where amended by the terms of this application. The applicant seeks approval for (a) option to subdivide the permitted warehouse, ABP Ref: 303343-19, (b) wholetime operation of the development to solely comply with condition 13 of approved plan ABP Ref:303343-19, relating to noise levels. (c) modification of the Eastern elevation of the existing warehouse to accommodate the upgrade of existing loading bay facilities, to include metal clad canopy structure
Core Refusal Reason
The application was refused due to insufficient information regarding traffic and noise impacts, an inadequate site boundary that precluded a full assessment of ancillary areas, and a proposal for 24/7 operations that conflicted with previous planning conditions and residential amenity.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed 24/7 operation is inconsistent with Condition 10 of the parent permission (ABP Ref: 303343-19), which restricted hours to protect residential amenity, and would therefore contravene the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
- The applicant failed to provide necessary technical assessments, specifically a Traffic Impact Assessment and an updated Noise Impact Assessment, to evaluate the effects of subdividing the warehouse and increasing activity levels on the surrounding environment.
- The red line site boundary was too restrictive, excluding essential ancillary areas like parking, access, and noise mitigation berms, thereby preventing the Planning Authority from conducting a comprehensive assessment of the development's impact on residential amenities and public safety.