2465

Extension of Duration of Planning File 19/350 for the construction of three two bedroom house all 2 storey, with mezzanine space in the roof, in yard to the rear of property with car parking and pedestrian and vehicular access through existing street archway including all associated site works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out during the appropriate period, which is a mandatory legislative requirement for an extension of duration under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development permitted under Planning File 19/350 has not commenced, and therefore the statutory requirement for 'substantial works' to have been carried out during the appropriate period has not been met.
  • Under Section 42(1)(a)(i)(III) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended), the Planning Authority is not in a position to extend the life of a permission where no works have been undertaken.
  • The applicant failed to provide mandatory information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001, as amended, meaning the application fails to comply with the required legal standards.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Decision Document Summary

This application sought an extension of duration for a previously permitted development (Ref: 19/350) comprising three two-bedroom, two-storey houses at 29 The Glen, Waterford. While the application was submitted within the valid timeframe, the Planning Authority determined that no development had commenced on-site. Consequently, the proposal failed to meet the legislative threshold of having completed 'substantial works' required for an extension under Section 42 of the Planning and Development...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.