3446/23
PROTECTED STRUCTURE (RPS No. 5232): the development will principally consist of a change of use from office to embassy office/ chancery (224 sq.). The development also proposes modification, repair and upgrade works to the protected structure including the reinstatement of the gate, railings and plinth to front/northern boundary; the repair of external granite steps up to the principal entrance of building; the creation of 2 no. slot window opes at lower ground floor level to the rear/southern elevation of the main building and 1 no. window ope at upper ground floor level on the rear/southern elevation of the rear return and the provision of timber sash windows; the build-up of an existing window opening at first floor level on the southern elevation of the rear return and upper ground floor level and first floor level of the western elevation of the rear return and their making good to match existing; the provision of a 'box-out' (oriole) window at upper ground floor level on the western elevation of the rear return; the general replacement of existing upv windows with timber vertical sash windows to match the original; the widening of an internal door ope at lower ground floor level; the provision of a security door to replace the existing door on the western elevation of the rear return; the maintenance and repair of the roof and the boundary walls to the rear of the property; the provision of a screened bin storage facility in the front/northern garden area; the provision of 2 no. flagpoles to the front/north of the property and a removable plaque with coat of arms to the front of the building; the provision of a ramp at the front/north of the premises to the lower ground floor area; services installation; plant; lighting ; landscaping an internal and external works for the repair; upgrade and maintenance of the protected structure, together with ancillary associated works.
Decision Document Summary
No text availablePDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.