2443

PERMISSION to retain indefinitely the following structures as constructed on site:- (A) 4 bay extension constructed to the rear of the existing workshop, including rear canopy (B) Roadmaster Ready-Built Unit erected on site (C) Store extension constructed to the East side of the existing workshop (D) Sanding hut constructed to the West side of the workshop extension (E) Cement store, oil store & power washer store constructed on site (F) Shipping container erected on site. Planning permission for the following structures (G) New front extension comprising of unisex toilet and canteen (H) New 4 bay stores building (I) Revision to the East site boundary, to include new on-site wastewater treatment system, new car park; with all associated siteworks

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The applicant failed to demonstrate that the development would not adversely impact the River Goul (Natura 2000 site) and failed to adequately address environmental concerns and unauthorized site uses.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The applicant failed to provide sufficient information to rule out significant unmitigated impacts on the River Goul, part of the River Nore/River Barrow Special Area of Conservation, contrary to the Habitats Directive.
  • Granting permission would consolidate existing unauthorized developments and uses on the site, which the applicant failed to adequately address or include for retention in the further information response.
  • The applicant failed to demonstrate that the proposed wastewater treatment and surface water management systems would not have a detrimental impact on the environment or the amenities of the rural area.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Decision Document Summary

Brennan Fencing Ltd sought retention and planning permission for multiple industrial extensions and structures at their facility in Crosspatrick, Johnstown, Co. Kilkenny. The application was refused by Kilkenny County Council because the applicant failed to provide adequate further information to address environmental risks, specifically regarding potential impacts on a Natura 2000 site. Furthermore, the Planning Authority found that the proposal would consolidate unauthorized development and th...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.