Core Refusal Reason
The application failed to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 because the development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out during the original permission period.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development permitted under planning reference 19/189 has not commenced on-site as confirmed by a site inspection.
- No substantial works were carried out pursuant to the permission during the appropriate period, which is a mandatory requirement for an extension of duration.
- The application fails to comply with Section 42(1)(a)(i)(III) of the Planning and Development Act 2000, as amended, which governs the extension of the appropriate period.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The proposal sought an Extension of Duration for planning permission (ref. 19/189) for an extension to a playschool building and entrance alterations at Crooke, Passage East, Co. Waterford. The site is situated in a 'Rural Village' zone and a 'Most Sensitive' scenic area. The application was refused because the planning authority determined that development had not commenced and no substantial works had been undertaken, thus failing to satisfy the legislative requirements of Section 42 of the Pl...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.