2460116

The development will consist of: 1. Demolition of approx. 86.5m² two-storey derelict building with front elevation to be reinstated and change of use from dwelling to hostel 2. Construction of a 396m², 15 No. bedroom hostel to the rear and side of the reinstated derelict building described above 3. 17 no. residential units consisting of 5 no. 2 bed units, 8 no. 3 bed units and 4 no. 5 bed units 4. Demolition of existing derelict shed approx. 86m² 5. Demolition of approx. 139.7m² existing two-storey derelict dwelling (niah no. 32309002), with street and gable elevations to be reinstated and extended, additional extension to side and rear, and change of use from a dwelling to a restaurant 6. Associated site works including parking, riverside walk and site services. The proposed application will be accompanied by a Natura Impact Statement.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The unjustified demolition of two 'Buildings of Note' and the failure to provide a site-specific flood risk assessment.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed demolition of two 'Buildings of Note' lacks sufficient conservation justification and would contravene policies intended to preserve the architectural heritage and character of Ballysadare.
  • Insufficient information was provided to assess the impact of demolishing a building adjoining a protected structure, which is potentially detrimental to the character and setting of the protected asset.
  • The absence of a site-specific flood risk assessment means the Planning Authority cannot be satisfied that the development would not result in increased flood risk on the site or to downstream properties.

Cited Policies (CDP)

P-ARH-1P-ARH-28.2.CP-FRM-6P-UD-1P-UD-2

Decision Document Summary

The proposal involved a mixed-use development on Main Street, Ballysadare, Co. Sligo, including a 15-bedroom hostel, 17 residential units, and a restaurant, requiring the demolition of several derelict structures. Sligo County Council refused permission because the plan involved the unjustified removal of two 'Buildings of Note' (one of regional importance) and failed to provide an architectural assessment for works adjacent to a protected structure. Additionally, the application was deemed defi...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.