Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out on-site, which is a mandatory requirement for an extension under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended).
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- A site inspection conducted on 15th May 2024 confirmed that no physical works had commenced on the site in relation to the permitted development.
- The applicant acknowledged in the application form that no substantial works had been carried out pursuant to the original permission (Ref. 19/113).
- Under current legislation, specifically Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 as amended, the Planning Authority is obliged to refuse an extension of duration where development has not commenced or substantial works have not been completed.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for a previously granted permission (Ref. 19/113) for a single-storey side extension at 41 An Fiodan, Doughiska, Galway. The Planning Authority recommended refusal because a site inspection and the applicant's own submission confirmed that no works had commenced on-site. Following legislative amendments to Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act, extensions can no longer be granted for un-commenced developments or those lacking substantial ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.