Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out on-site prior to the expiration of the original permission, failing to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The development has not commenced and no substantial works have been carried out on-site, which is a mandatory requirement for an extension of duration under Section 42(1)(a) of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
- The applicant failed to provide necessary information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 regarding the class of development and screening determinations.
- As the development had not commenced, it is not legally possible under the revised legislation to grant an extension of duration for the planning permission.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref. 18/802) to construct a single-storey dwelling, entrance, and treatment system at Curraghteskin, Ballymacarbry, Co. Waterford. Upon assessment and site inspection, the planning authority confirmed that no works had commenced on the site. The proposal was refused as it failed to satisfy the statutory criteria of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, which requires that substantial works be completed durin...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.