D23A/0200

A) demolition of an existing detached garage and garden shed. B) relocation of e

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The proposed development is consistent with the residential zoning objective (Objective A) and policies favoring compact urban growth through infill development; the design and scale are considered compatible with the area's character and will not seriously injure the residential amenities of adjacent properties.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposal provides for an appropriate increase in residential density on a serviced urban site, aligning with national and local policies for compact growth.
  • The contemporary 3-storey design with setback upper levels is an acceptable architectural response that respects the established building line and protects the privacy of neighboring dwellings.
  • Concerns regarding restrictive covenants, biodiversity (bats), and drainage were assessed and found not to be impediments to a grant of permission, subject to compliance with specific planning conditions.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy PHP18 (Residential Density)PHP19 (Existing Housing Stock - Adaptation)PHP20 (Protection of Existing Residential Amenity)PHP42 (Building Design & Height)Section 12.3.7.5 (Corner and Side Gardens)Section 12.3.7.7 (Infill)Policy Objective EI6 (Sustainable Drainage Systems)Section 12.4.8.3 (Driveways/Hardstanding Areas)Section 12.8.11 (Existing Trees and Hedgerows)Objective OSR7 (Trees, Woodland and Forestry)Objective GIB18 (Protection of Natural Heritage and the Environment)Section 12.3.4.2 (Habitable Rooms)

Decision Document Summary

This proposal involves the demolition of a detached garage and garden shed at 12 Brennanstown Vale, Dublin 18, to facilitate the construction of two detached, 5-bedroom, 3-storey houses (featuring setback attic/penthouse levels). The site is a 0.1538ha portion of the side garden of 'Al Fatima'. The Planning Authority (DLRCC) initially granted permission, which was subsequently appealed by third parties who cited concerns over excessive density, incongruous design, and a restrictive covenant. The...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP