2460556

for revisions to housing development previously permitted under Pl. Ref. No. 21/2388. The development will consist of; (1) Construction of 7 no. additional houses, comprising of; 2 no. Type A 4 bedroom 2 storey semi-detached houses, 4 no. Type B 3 bedroom 2 storey semi-detached houses, 1 no. Type D 2 bedroom single storey bungalow. (2) Variation/omission of Condition No.’s 1, 2 & 17(b) of Pl. Ref. No. 21/2388, (3) Provision for bin storage collection points, (4) Connection to services permitted under Pl. Ref. No. 21/2388, together with all associated site works. Gross floor space of proposed works: 788.60 sqm

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed development fails to provide adequate turning areas for large vehicles at the end of cul-de-sacs, creating a traffic hazard and endangering public safety.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The absence of adequate turning facilities for large vehicles at the end of cul-de-sacs would interfere with the safety and free flow of traffic, posing a risk to public safety.
  • The addition of 7 residential units on lands zoned 'Residential - Phase 2' has not been satisfactorily justified in accordance with the phasing requirements of the Headford Settlement Plan.
  • The proposed layout is inconsistent with the principles of proper planning and sustainable development, specifically regarding DMURS street layout design principles and the necessity for emergency vehicle access.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 7.5.3Section 8.13Section 10.6Section 10.15Section 14.4Section 14.6Section 15.2.4Section 15.6Section 15.7.2Section 15.13.2Policy SS5SGT 1HSGT 2Policy Objective CS 1

Decision Document Summary

The applicant sought permission for revisions to a previously permitted housing development at Ellagh, Headford, including the construction of 7 additional houses on lands zoned 'Residential - Phase 2'. The proposal was refused by Galway County Council primarily due to the lack of adequate turning areas for large vehicles at cul-de-sac ends, which was deemed a traffic hazard. Additionally, the planning authority found that the intensification of development on Phase 2 lands was not sufficiently ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.