Core Refusal Reason
The proposal is contrary to housing objectives regarding ancillary buildings, would negatively impact residential amenities, and would facilitate the consolidation of unauthorised structures on site.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed development is contrary to Town and Village Housing Objective TVHO 11 of the Mayo County Development Plan 2022-2028, as it would injure residential amenities and depreciate property values in the vicinity.
- The applicant failed to address or remedy the refusal reasons set out in a previous planning application (P23/681) for the same site.
- Granting permission would inappropriately facilitate the consolidation of an existing unauthorised structure (a second garage) located on the application site.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Draft Castlebar Town and Environs Plan 2023-2029Mayo County Development Plan 2022-2028Town and Village Housing Objective TVHO 11Section 4.15 of Volume 2 (Development Management standards)
Decision Document Summary
This application sought retention permission for an existing domestic garage and permission for its change of use to a single-bed annex at No. 8 Maryland, Castlebar, Co. Mayo. The site is located within an established residential development. Mayo County Council refused the application because the development is contrary to specific housing objectives (TVHO 11) regarding ancillary units, would set an undesirable precedent, and would facilitate the consolidation of unauthorised structures already...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.