Core Reason for the Refused Part
The proposed front and side alterations, specifically the hip-to-gable roof conversion and two-storey extension, were deemed visually dominant, incongruous, and out of character with the established streetscape.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The combined design and scale of the bay window, porch, and two-storey extensions would read as visually dominant and incongruous when viewed from the streetscape.
- The proposed hip-to-gable roof alteration is considered visually intrusive and would detract from the architectural coherence of the surrounding dwellings.
- The front elevation alterations would contravene specific County Development Plan standards regarding extensions to the front of dwellings and would injure the amenities of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 12.3.7.1 Extensions to Dwellings (i) Extensions to the Front
Decision Document Summary
The proposal at 20 Leopardstown Drive, Stillorgan, sought permission for a single-storey rear extension along with significant front and side modifications, including a hip-to-gable roof conversion and a two-storey extension. While the Planning Authority granted permission for the rear extension, it refused the front and side elements. The refusal was based on the conclusion that the scale and design of the front-facing alterations would be visually intrusive and out of character with the establ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.