Core Refusal Reason
The development was refused due to insufficient information regarding waste management and water protection, non-compliance with national design specifications for equine facilities, and the potential for nuisance to neighboring residents due to the stables' proximity and the applicant's remote place of residence.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The application failed to provide adequate information on water supply and fodder storage, and the proposed effluent tank capacity is insufficient, creating a risk of water pollution contrary to CPO 9.40.
- The siting of the stable block at approximately 35m from a third-party dwelling is significantly below the recommended 100m buffer, presenting a risk of nuisance noise and odour prejudicial to public health.
- The design does not meet the Department of Agriculture's S156 minimum specifications, and the applicant's remote residence (c. 9.5km away) raises concerns regarding the timely management of the facility and potential for nuisance.
Cited Policies (CDP)
CPO 9.40CPO 9.41S156 Minimum Specification for Horse Facilities and FencingObjective HD23Objective LID23Section 4.4
Decision Document Summary
Luke Connors sought permission for a 69sqm stable block to accommodate two horses on a 0.81ha site at Balleese Lower, Rathdrum, Co. Wicklow. The site is located in a rural area designated as an Area of High Amenity. The Planning Authority refused the proposal because it failed to demonstrate adequate environmental protection measures regarding effluent storage and water supply. Furthermore, the stables were deemed too close to a neighboring residence, the design did not adhere to national specif...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.