2460332

for the change of use of the existing disused single storey farm outbuildings to accommodate 4No. ensuite bedroom short stay holiday units & associate tourism accommodation services, i.e, kitchen, laundry, store, & the change of use of the existing haybarn to a covered seating area/ farmyard tea rooms including the provision of new toilets adjacent as part of a heritage tourism project for the site. The site current accommodates an existing thatched cottage which is a protected structure, RPS Ref. DV740128.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal was refused due to the inappropriate subdivision of a residential site containing a Protected Structure, the potential negative impact on built heritage and residential amenity, and inadequate assessment of flood risks for future users.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed commercial development and site subdivision would undermine the town and village centre functions of Dungarvan and Abbeyside while setting an undesirable precedent for uncoordinated commercial offerings in established residential areas.
  • The applicant failed to demonstrate that the redevelopment of outbuildings would not negatively impact the character and setting of the Protected Structure on-site, contravening Built Heritage policies.
  • The submitted Flood Risk Assessment failed to adequately assess the risks to visiting members of the public or provide necessary evacuation and emergency management plans for a site located within a Flood Zone.

Cited Policies (CDP)

BH1BH2BH10BH11BH12BH05BH 02BH 06BH 08BH 23BH 24BH 29AH 01AH 02ECON 24

Decision Document Summary

This application sought permission for the conversion of disused farm outbuildings into four short-stay holiday units and a tea room at The Thatch, Strandside South, Abbeyside, Dungarvan. The site is home to a protected thatched cottage and is located within an Architectural Conservation Area and a Flood Zone. The Planning Authority refused permission because the proposal represented an inappropriate commercial intensification and subdivision of a sensitive heritage site, failed to protect the s...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.