2460363

extensions and alterations to existing 85.2m² dwelling to comprise (1) construction of new 16.3m² ground floor mono pitched extension to rear of existing dwelling including 2 roof lights which will incorporate a new kitchen and dining room area in an amended ground floor layout, (2) construction of new 6.5m² pitched roof first floor extension to rear of existing dwelling which will incorporate a new bedroom in an amended first floor layout, (3) construction of new dormer with flat roof to front and rear of existing dwelling to facilitate conversion of the existing attic space to new 16.4m² study/playroom/store, (4) construction of new high level window to gable wall, (5) alterations and modifications to existing elevations and internal layout and all associated works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed attic dormer extension is considered excessive in scale, top-heavy, and out of character with the existing dwelling and surrounding area, while also posing a risk of increased overlooking to neighboring properties.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The design of the proposed dormer extension is considered excessive in height, width, and scale, resulting in a top-heavy appearance that distorts the dwelling's character and is out of keeping with the surrounding residential estate.
  • The applicant failed to demonstrate that the attic conversion, which effectively introduces a third-floor level, would not significantly increase overlooking or perceived overlooking of adjacent private amenity spaces.
  • The application lacked sufficient technical detail and a revised site layout plan to adequately address the management of existing services and surface water disposal on the site.

Cited Policies (CDP)

CPO 6.21Appendix 1: Development and Design StandardsSection 3.1.8

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought planning permission for extensions and alterations to an existing end-of-terrace dwelling at 26 Springfield Court, Wicklow Town, including ground and first-floor rear extensions and an attic conversion with front and rear dormers. While the principle of residential extension is supported by policy CPO 6.21, the Planning Authority determined that the dormer design was visually intrusive and out of character with the established urban estate. Additionally, concerns regarding th...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.