2460230

development of self-catering, chalet accommodation at Ballymahon Road (R392), Rathcolman, Mullingar, Co. Westmeath. The development comprises; the erection of 5 no. chalet/cabin units to create overnight accommodation totalling 425 sqm to facilitate the accommodation demands of visiting tourists, the provision of associated visitor parking (12 no.), cycle parking (20 no.) accessed from an existing and proposed improved vehicular access, a proposed wastewater treatment system and all associated ancillary services, above and below ground and landscaping proposals to integrate, promote and enhance biodiversity

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal was deemed unacceptable due to inappropriate siting and design that fails to integrate with the landscape, potential environmental risks regarding wastewater treatment on sloping ground near sensitive watercourses, and non-compliance with road safety policies regarding access onto a regional road.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed chalets are considered visually obtrusive and uncharacteristic of the rural setting, failing to integrate with the existing topography or the established commercial equestrian buildings.
  • The proposed wastewater treatment system and percolation area are located on excessive slopes near a watercourse feeding into Natura 2000 sites, posing a risk to public health and environmental protection.
  • The proposed vehicular access onto the R-392 Strategic Regional Road contravenes policy to safeguard road capacity when alternative access via a lower-category local road is available.

Cited Policies (CDP)

CPO 6.15CPO 6.16CPO 6.25CPO 6.27CPO 6.29CPO 6.30CPO 6.32CPO 9.33CPO 9.34CPO 9.36CPO 16.52Section 10.5.2

Decision Document Summary

This application sought permission for the development of five self-catering chalet units and associated infrastructure at the Mullingar Equestrian Centre, Rathcolman, Co. Westmeath. While the principle of tourism development was welcomed, the Planning Authority identified significant grounds for refusal (issued as a Further Information request) due to the units' intrusive design and elevated siting in an open landscape. Furthermore, significant concerns were raised regarding the suitability of ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.