Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because substantial works had not been carried out on the site as required by legislation, and mandatory environmental screening information was not provided.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The applicant confirmed that substantial works have not been carried out to date, meaning the application fails to meet the mandatory requirements of Section 42(1)(a)(i)(III) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended).
- The application failed to provide the information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 to enable the Planning Authority to undertake a mandatory Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) screening determination.
- Due to the lack of necessary environmental information and the failure to meet statutory criteria regarding the commencement of works, the extension of duration would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Waterford City & County Development Plan 2022-2028: Zoned Existing Residential [RS]
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref: 19/966) concerning the sub-division of an existing site and the construction of a bungalow at 15 Grove Court, Tramore, Co. Waterford. The Planning Authority refused the request because the applicant admitted that substantial works had not yet been undertaken, which is a legal prerequisite for such an extension under Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act. Furthermore, the application was deemed non-compliant due ...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.