2460248
(a) Permission for retention of detached domestic garage as constructed on site which differs in size, plan and elevations from that permitted under PL 18/415. (b) Permission to retain second detached shed on site. (c) Permission to retain decking area to rear of dwelling house and all associated site works
Refused
Core Refusal Reason
The outbuildings are refused due to their excessive height and scale, which are not subordinate to the primary dwelling, resulting in a visually obtrusive development that is out of character with the rural area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The scale and height of the outbuildings (7.095m) are not subordinate to the existing dwelling and significantly exceed the previously granted permission (PL 18/415).
- The detached sheds appear to be used for commercial storage rather than domestic purposes, which does not align with the current County Development Plan provisions for ancillary residential structures.
- The development is visually obtrusive, overbearing, and incongruous with the local landscape, setting a poor precedent and seriously injuring the amenities of the area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
13.4.8 Ancillary buildings13.2.2 Impact of development on its surroundingsSligo County Development Plan 2017-2023
Decision Document Summary
The applicant, John Divers, sought retention permission for a detached domestic garage, a second shed, and a decking area at a rural site in Cams, Ballymote, Co. Sligo. Sligo County Council refused the application primarily because the outbuildings were excessive in scale and height, failing to remain subordinate to the main dwelling house. The Planning Authority determined that the structures, which appeared to be in commercial use, were visually obtrusive and contrary to the proper planning an...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.