2460158

the proposed extension of an existing telecommunications lattice support structure (providing new overall height of 21 metres to top of lightning finials), including the removal of an existing headframe from the existing telecommunications lattice support structure. The proposed extended telecommunications lattice support structure will carry existing telecommunications equipment, relocated telecommunications equipment and new antennas, dishes and all associated equipment, together with new ground level equipment cabinets and site development works.

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed extension of the telecommunications structure would be visually obtrusive and discordant within the Carrick-on-Shannon Architectural Conservation Area, negatively impacting the setting of multiple Protected Structures and the residential amenity of Hatley Manor.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The increased height of the structure would result in a visually dominant and discordant feature that fails to respect the sensitive urban character of the Carrick-on-Shannon Architectural Conservation Area.
  • The development would have a profound adverse impact on the setting, context, and appreciation of several nearby Protected Structures, including Hatley Manor and its associated glasshouse.
  • The proposal would seriously injure the residential amenities of adjoining properties, specifically Hatley Manor, and fails to provide sufficient technical justification to outweigh the significant heritage and visual impacts.

Cited Policies (CDP)

ACA POL 1ACA POL 2BH POL 1BH POL 5BH OBJ 1TEL POL 1TEL POL 2TEL POL 3TEL POL 4TEL POL 5TEL OBJ 1Section 13.20.3Section 11.30Section 9.18

Decision Document Summary

Towercom Limited sought permission to extend an existing 12-metre telecommunications lattice tower to a total height of 21 metres at the Eir Exchange in Carrick-on-Shannon. The site is located within an Architectural Conservation Area and is immediately adjacent to several Protected Structures, including Hatley Manor. The Planning Authority refused permission because the proposed height increase would make the structure visually obtrusive and dominant, detracting from the historic streetscape an...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.