Core Refusal Reason
The proposed two-storey extension was refused due to its excessive massing, lack of subordination to the original dwelling, and the inclusion of a second-storey window that would cause undue overlooking and negatively impact the residential amenity of the adjoining property.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The inclusion of a second-storey window contravenes standard DMS-15 as it would result in direct overlooking of the curtilage of the adjoining property, thereby negatively impacting its residential amenity.
- The proposed extension is not subordinate in size to the main dwelling and its massing is considered unduly obtrusive and out of character with the existing streetscape and surrounding properties.
- The development would seriously injure the visual amenities of the area and set an undesirable precedent for similar inappropriate developments, making it contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the region.
Cited Policies (CDP)
LUZO-03DMS-15DMS-55Policy BLP-24
Decision Document Summary
Eugene and Jan Byrne sought permission for an 89.55m² two-storey rear extension to an existing single-storey semi-detached house at Laurencetown, Rhode, Co. Offaly. The site is zoned 'Existing Residential' under the Offaly County Development Plan 2021-2027. Offaly County Council refused permission primarily because the extension's scale was not subordinate to the original house, creating an obtrusive massing that would harm the local streetscape. Additionally, the proposal included a side window...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.