Core Refusal Reason
The canopy and its substantial support infrastructure constitute an incongruous and insensitive addition to a protected structure, creating an unsightly and obtrusive feature that detracts from the building's architectural character and the visual amenity of the surrounding conservation area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The permanent 'scaffold-like' support frame and associated apparatus create a significant adverse impact on the protected structure, appearing particularly cumbersome and obtrusive when the canopy is retracted.
- The design fails to comply with the Dublin City Council Shopfront Design Guide 2001 and Ministerial Guidelines, specifically regarding the requirement for open-ended blinds and discreet integration with historical facades.
- While the principle of a canopy is acceptable for the commercial use, this specific development's scale and form represent an unsympathetic addition that fails to protect the character of the Georgian Conservation Area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Policy BHA2(b)Policy BHA2(d)Policy BHA2(e)Policy BHA9Policy CCUV12Section 11.5.3Section 15.17.5Zoning Z4Appendix 17
Decision Document Summary
This report evaluates a retention application for a large (18m long, 2.5m projection) retractable closed-ended canopy with a permanent metal support frame at 43-44 Baggot Street Lower, Dublin 2. The site consists of interconnected four-storey former houses that are designated protected structures in a Z4 'Urban Village' zone. The Inspector notes that while the principle of a canopy is supported by the site's commercial function, the actual installation is problematic. The support structure is de...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.
PDF Document Missing
The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.
Search for case on ABP