24217

EXTENSION OF DURATION of pl. file 18/851:a change of use to former Parish Hall (St. Patrick's), to the following proposed uses: 1 No. Sandwich/Deli Bar, 1 No. Beauty/Hair Salon, 1 No. Veterinary Supplies Store, 1 No. Retail unit, all on the ground floor. Along with 4 No. store/staff rooms associated with the proposed ground floor units on the first floor. To facilitate the changes, the demolition of existing single storey annex to the east and existing handball alley side walls is required along with minor changes to existing single storey annex to the west, some window and door open changes and the provision of parking to the rear, onsite. Site access changes, and all associated site work

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The application for an extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works were carried out prior to the expiration of the original planning permission, failing to meet the mandatory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development to which the permission relates was not commenced before the expiration of the appropriate period sought to be extended.
  • Substantial works were not carried out pursuant to the permission during the appropriate period, as required by Section 42(1)(a) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended).
  • The applicant failed to provide the information required under Article 42(ff) of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001 regarding screening for environmental impact assessment or other limit specifications.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought an extension of duration for planning permission (Ref. 18/851) to convert the former Parish Hall at Curtiswood, Ballymacarbry, Co. Waterford, into a mixed-use facility comprising a sandwich/deli bar, beauty salon, veterinary supplies store, and retail unit. Waterford City and County Council refused the application primarily because the development had not yet commenced and no substantial works had been performed on-site. Furthermore, the application was found to be non-compli...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.