D23A/0268

Demolition of the single storey industrial unit and the construction of 2 X

Granted

Core Planning Reasoning

The proposed development represents an inappropriate design due to a poor street interface, inadequate internal daylight levels, and a failure to demonstrate safe vehicular turning movements, which would result in a poor standard of residential amenity and negatively impact the visual character of the area.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The extensive under-croft parking creates a poor interface with the streetscape and fails to provide an active frontage, dominating the property's width in contravention of development plan standards.
  • The significant depth of the first-floor overhang (4.7m) would severely restrict natural light and sky visibility for the ground-floor living rooms, resulting in an unacceptable level of residential amenity for future occupants.
  • The applicant failed to provide adequate vehicle tracking or evidence that safe turning movements can be achieved on the narrow lane, creating potential traffic hazards and obstructions for other road users.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Objective 'A'Policy Objective PHP19Policy Objective PHP20Section 12.3.1.1Section 12.3.4.2Section 12.3.7.7Section 12.3.7.5Section 12.4.5.1Section 12.4.8.1Section 12.4.8.2Policy Objective CA6Policy Objective OSR7

Decision Document Summary

The proposal involves the demolition of a single-storey industrial unit and the construction of two semi-detached, three-bedroom houses on a restricted brownfield site in Blackrock, Co. Dublin. While the site is zoned for residential use (Objective 'A') and the Planning Authority originally granted permission, the Inspector recommended refusal following a third-party appeal. The core of the Inspector's argument centers on the design's failure to integrate with the streetscape, largely due to the...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.

PDF Document Missing

The original decision document for this case could not be linked. This often happens for older cases or those with restricted documentation.

Search for case on ABP