Core Refusal Reason
The internal layout is inconsistent with the submitted plans, suggesting unauthorized residential use rather than a home office, combined with inadequate details regarding wastewater and surface water management.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The internal layout of the structure, featuring a kitchen area, bedframe, and full bathroom facilities, is inconsistent with the proposed home office/study use and suggests a separate residential unit.
- The applicant failed to provide adequate design proposals or calculations for surface water disposal to demonstrate compliance with Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) policy.
- There is insufficient information regarding the treatment of wastewater, specifically how the outbuilding connects to the existing system given the significant difference in ground levels.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Section 13.8.37Chapter 13.9.8Chapter 13.9.10Policy Objective IU 19Policy Objective NGB 6Policy Objective IU 16Policy Objective IU 17Policy Objective IU 18
Decision Document Summary
James Clerkin sought retention permission and permission for the renovation of a derelict structure into a home office/study at South Commons, Carlingford. While the external design was deemed acceptable, a site inspection revealed internal fixtures (kitchen, shower, toilet, bedframe) inconsistent with the application, raising concerns about unauthorized residential use in a Rural Policy Zone. Additionally, the lack of technical details regarding wastewater treatment and surface water drainage l...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.