Core Refusal Reason
The proposed shed extension infringes the established building line and is located too close to the roadside boundary, resulting in a negative visual impact in a visually sensitive area.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The proposed extension would be located within 5 metres of the roadside boundary fence, which is significantly less than the required setback for rural roads.
- The development would infringe upon the established building line set by the existing dwelling house on the site.
- The resulting visual impact is considered negative and contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the visually sensitive landscape area.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective KCDP 11-77Objective KCDP 11-78Section 11.6.3Section 11.6.3.1Section 1.20.1
Decision Document Summary
Gillian Murphy sought permission to extend an existing domestic shed at Coarha Beg Upper, Valentia Island, a location designated as a Visually Sensitive Area. While the principle of development was considered, the Planning Authority refused permission because the extension would be sited less than 5 metres from the roadside boundary. This positioning infringes the established building line of the primary dwelling and was deemed to have a negative visual impact, making it contrary to the Kerry Co...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.