2461134

for extensions and alterations to existing two storey dwelling comprising: 1) The construction of new single and two storey extensions to the front, side and rear of the existing two storey house including all internal reconfiguration and associated refurbishment works. 2) Removal of existing garden sheds and rear garden boundary fence and construction of new garden shed and new wall to the northeast boundary. 3) Widening of the existing vehicular entrance and associated alterations to wall, kerbs and footpath. 4) Extension of height of existing front boundary wall with new fencing. 5) All associated site development works, drainage, hard & soft landscaping, and all other ancillary works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposed development, by virtue of its design, scale, and bulk, fails to integrate with the existing dwelling and surrounding residential character, resulting in an incongruous transition that detracts from the visual amenities of the area.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The scale and bulk of the proposed extensions would distort the form of the existing dwelling and fail to respect the established character of the residential estate, which is defined by similar style dwellings and coordinated finishes.
  • The proposed addition of dark timber/composite fencing to the front boundary wall would increase its height to 1.5m, creating a defensible structure that is contrary to Development Plan guidance regarding boundary treatments.
  • The overall design represents an incongruous transition in character that would detract from the visual amenities of the area and be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the Louisa Valley estate.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Section 15.4.12Section 15.4.13Section 15.4.5Chapter 15

Decision Document Summary

The proposal sought permission for significant extensions and alterations to a two-storey dwelling at 15 The Grove, Louisa Valley, Leixlip, including front, side, and rear extensions, a new garden shed, and boundary wall modifications. While the site is zoned for 'Existing / Infill Residential' use, the Planning Authority refused permission because the design failed to integrate with the existing house and the wider estate. The scale and bulk of the extensions, combined with the proposed high fr...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.