2461590

for (i) amendments to previously permitted development under Pl. Ref. 23/61472 to consist of change in design to renovation permitted and (ii) permission for extension. The planning application is accompanied by an NIS. Gross floor space of proposed works: 240.51 sqm(extension). Gross floor space of work to be retained: 57.00 sqm(house). Gross floor space of any demolition: 20.00 sqm

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal was refused due to its negative visual impact on a sensitive coastal landscape and potential adverse effects on the integrity of the Slyne Head Peninsula SAC.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed extension is considered an overbearing form of development that fails to subordinate to the original structure, resulting in an obtrusive element in a sensitive Class 3 coastal landscape.
  • The proposed amendments to the renovation element would result in the loss of the traditional character and fabric of the original cottage, detracting from the vernacular and visual amenity of the area.
  • The Planning Authority is not satisfied that the development will not adversely affect the Slyne Head Peninsula SAC, particularly as previous mitigation measures required under the parent permission were not implemented on-site.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Policy Objective RH7Policy Objective RH 9Policy Objective FL 1Policy Objective LCM 1Policy Objective LCM 2Policy Objective LCM 3DM Standard 4DM Standard 8DM Standard 9DM Standard 11DM Standard 28DM Standard 29DM Standard 36DM Standard 38DM Standard 46DM Standard 47DM Standard 50DM Standard 67Policy Objective NHB 1Policy Objective NHB 2Policy Objective NHB 3Policy Objective NHB 4Policy Objective WR 1

Decision Document Summary

Shane Sweeney sought permission for amendments to a previously approved renovation and a significant new extension at Bunowen Beg, Ballyconneely, Co. Galway. The site is located within the Slyne Head Peninsula SAC and a designated Class 3 sensitive landscape. The application was refused because the proposed extension was deemed overbearing and discordant with the traditional cottage's character, failing to meet design standards for rural extensions. Furthermore, the Planning Authority raised ser...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.