2460751

Permission for proposed development to consist of a six-storey over basement mixed-use development comprising: (a) The provision of bin, bicycle and bulky goods storage along with storage and plant rooms at basement level. (b) The provision of a ground floor office and a retail unit. (c) Provision of 10no. 1bed apartments and 10no. 2bed apartments. (d) Provision for foul and surface water drainage. (e) Demolition of the existing two-storey office and retail buildings on the site. (f) All other associated and ancillary works. The application is accompanied by a Natura Impact Statement (NIS)

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal constitutes over-development of a constrained town centre site, resulting in substandard residential amenity due to poor design quality, inadequate internal storage, and the complete omission of communal open space.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The development represents over-development of the site, characterized by 'pinch points' and staggered walls that undermine functionality, alongside a failure to provide any communal open space or sufficient internal and bulky storage.
  • The proposed internal layout does not comply with Part B of the Building Regulations (Fire Safety), with the Fire Service indicating that a Fire Safety Certificate for the current design would be refused.
  • The application failed to meet mandatory requirements regarding Part V (Social and Affordable Housing) and provided inadequate site-specific documentation in the Building Lifecycle Report and Mobility Management Plan.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Table 13.3Policy CS 2HOU 15HOU 20HOU 25HOU 30Section 13.8Section 13.8.17Section 13.8.19Section 13.8.28IU 19BHC 32

Decision Document Summary

Nera Investments Ltd proposed a six-storey over basement mixed-use development at 23-24 Francis Street, Dundalk, featuring ground-floor office/retail units and 20 apartments. Located within the Roden Place Architectural Conservation Area, the principle of development was acceptable; however, the Planning Authority determined the scheme was an over-development of the site. The proposal was deemed unacceptable in its current form due to substandard residential amenities—specifically regarding floo...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.