Core Refusal Reason
The application for an extension of duration was refused because the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out on-site, failing to meet the statutory requirements of Section 42 of the Planning and Development Act 2000.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- A site inspection confirmed that no construction works have commenced on the site as of June 2023.
- The applicant acknowledged that only minor maintenance, upkeep, and boundary works have been undertaken to date.
- The proposal fails to satisfy the mandatory requirements of Section 42(1)(c)(i) and (ii) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) regarding the commencement and execution of substantial works.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought an extension of duration for planning permission ref. 17/834, which provided for the construction of 8 two-storey dwelling houses and a new access road at Rhebogue Road, Rhebogue, Co. Limerick. Upon assessment, the Planning Authority found that the development had not commenced and no substantial works had been carried out during the appropriate period of the original permission. Consequently, the application was refused as it did not meet the legislative requirements set ou...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.