Core Refusal Reason
The proposal would result in the loss of communal open space and create a visually discordant feature on a prominent corner site, contrary to the established character of the estate.
Decision Maker's Conclusion
- The incorporation of communal green space into the private residential curtilage would diminish the amenity value of the estate and set a negative precedent for similar developments.
- The proposed side extension is considered over-scaled for the corner plot, resulting in a cramped appearance that fails to respect the existing building line and streetscape.
- The development would be visually intrusive and would fail to integrate successfully with the character and pattern of development in the Glenina estate.
Cited Policies (CDP)
Objective CDP 4.15Objective CDP 15.5Objective CDP 19.2
Decision Document Summary
The applicant sought permission for a side extension and the enlargement of the site boundary at 63 Glenina, Ennis, a semi-detached dwelling on a prominent corner plot. The proposal involved enclosing a portion of the adjacent communal green area to expand the private garden. Clare County Council refused the application because the boundary enlargement would result in the loss of shared amenity space and the extension's design was deemed visually dominant and out of character with the surroundin...SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.