2560040

new 2 storey extension to existing dwelling,raising of existing roof to cater for first floor extension, a single storey side and rear extension with a balcony above ,new storage shed to front of existing dwelling, upgrade of existing effluent disposal system to current Epa standards and all associated site works

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The proposal was refused due to its excessive scale and non-subordinate design which introduces incongruous suburban elements into a rural Area of High Amenity, its negative impact on the setting of an adjacent protected structure, and significant technical information deficits regarding traffic safety and wastewater treatment.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The proposed extension is disproportionately large (220% increase in floor area) and fails to remain subordinate to the original dwelling, introducing alien suburban features that would be visually intrusive within a designated Area of High Amenity.
  • The development would negatively impact the character and setting of the adjacent protected structure (Kilfee Former National School), and the application lacked sufficient contextual elevations to demonstrate otherwise.
  • The applicant failed to provide adequate technical details to ensure public health and safety, specifically regarding the suitability of the wastewater treatment system in an area with a high water table and the safety of the site entrance and sightlines.

Cited Policies (CDP)

CPO 6.3CPO 6.4CPO 6.44CPO 6.45CPO 6.46CPO 12.54CPO 13.1CPO 13.16CPO 13.20CPO 17.5CPO 17.6CPO 17.14CPO 17.23CPO 17.35CPO 17.36CPO 17.38Appendix 1Appendix 2Appendix 5

Decision Document Summary

Roy Stapelton proposed a substantial two-storey extension, a new storage shed, and an upgraded effluent disposal system for an existing bungalow at Kilfee, Ashford, Co. Wicklow. The site is located in a rural Area of High Amenity and immediately adjoins a protected structure (the former Kilfee National School). Wicklow County Council refused the application primarily because the extension's scale was deemed excessive and out of character with the rural landscape. Additionally, the council cited ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.