2560083

for a period of 10 years to construction and complete a Solar PV and BESS Development with a total site area of 235.8 hectares to include PV panels mounted on metal frames, inverter stations, battery storage infrastructure, (BESS units, PCS Units, storage and maintenance units), new access tracks, underground cabling, perimeter fencing with CCTV cameras and access gates, temporary construction compounds and all ancillary grid infrastructure and associated works. The solar farm would be operational for 40 years. A Natura Impact Statement (NIS) will be submitted with this application

Refused

Core Refusal Reason

The application was refused due to significant information deficiencies regarding fire safety, environmental impacts, and archaeology, combined with concerns over traffic safety, hedgerow removal, and the use of productive agricultural land.

Decision Maker's Conclusion

  • The applicant failed to provide adequate technical details regarding fire safety for the BESS and failed to rule out significant adverse impacts on the integrity of European sites and archaeological heritage.
  • The creation of two new access points onto the R407 regional road would result in a traffic hazard and interfere with the safety and free flow of traffic in an 80km/h zone.
  • The proposal constitutes an inappropriate development on productive agricultural land and involves the removal of over 320m of hedgerow, which is contrary to policies seeking to protect the rural environment and biodiversity.

Cited Policies (CDP)

Objective RD 07Objective EC O19Objective TM O95Objective BI O9Objective BI O10Objective AH O2Objective EC O21Section 7.6Objective EC O9Objective BI O26

Decision Document Summary

Elgin Energy ESI Ltd. proposed a 235.8-hectare solar farm and 200MW battery energy storage system (BESS) with a 40-year operational lifespan across multiple townlands south of Kilcock, Co. Kildare. The development was refused by Kildare County Council due to a 'dearth of information' regarding fire safety risks associated with the BESS, poor-quality environmental and archaeological assessments, and the potential for traffic hazards on the R407. Additionally, the council found the project failed ...
SOURCE PDFOpen Original
Note: If code appears below, the council site is blocking the preview. Please open the original file.